Random rantings and ravings about the Los Angeles Dodgers, written by a small consortium of rabid Dodger fans. With occasional comments on baseball, entertainment, pop culture, and life in general.
Ok, I thought about it and it's only fair that if we have some 7-roll rounds, we also have some 9-roll ones. So here's the sched:
Don't ask me what the logic or reason is, as there is none. Just trying to mix it up and confuse people.
Anyhow, today: eight rolls. Next round (probably Monday): only seven. Now, roll, dammit!
Rules and side comments here.
4/3 vs. SF (W, 5-4): Sax
4/15 vs. WSH (L, 4-6): Dusty, Orel, Sax
5/6 vs. MIA (W, 6-3): AC, Sax
5/16 vs. CIN (L, 2-7): AC, Sax
6/12 vs. TEX (L, 2-3): Sax
7/5 vs. MIL (W, 8-5): Sax
7/21 vs. BOS (W, 9-6): Sax
7/24 vs. SF (L, 3-8): Sax
8/24 vs. TB (L, 8-9 (10)): Sax
8/29 vs. BAL (W, 6-3): Orel, Sax
9/9 vs. CHC (L, 4-10): Sax
10/5 NLDS G1 vs. SD (W, 7-5): Sax
10/6 NLDS G2 vs. SD (L, 2-10): Orel, Sax
10/25 WS G1 vs. NYY (W, 6-3 (10)): Sax
45 comments:
*shakes dice in a cup*
*yells boom goes the dynamite*
*rolls dice*
Roll it yeah
Here goes...
go
Sons: 4 3
Readers: 2 2
c'mon deuce.
Drops a deuce?
*adds fiber to diet*
How unsatisfying.
2-2-3-4-5, gives us a good shot at a short and long straight, though.
(tries...again)
My first roll was a 1, no?
keep them doggies rollin'
Roll?
If I'm not mistaken, I've got
2 2 3 1 5 4 1 4
That gives us a nice large straight!
Craaaaap.
2-2-1-5-4-1-4-6
I think you're missing Mr C at 8:34
@Josh - I've got Mr. C's 834 comment as a 3... 377.
So that gives us:
2(me)
2(Mr. C)
3(Mr. C)
1(Josh)
5(Mr. C)
4(Mr. C)
1(Josh)
1(Mr. F)
Still looks like a large straight.
I guess we can't have a round without me screwing something up. At least it worked out for the best!
@ Steve D: I'm feeling a little neglected... (not that it actually matters since I rolled a 4)
Wait. Only 3 of Mr. C's rolls count, so it's:
2 (Dittmore)
2 (Mr. C)
3 (Mr. C)
1 (Me)
5 (Mr. C)
1 (Me)
4 (J. Steve)
6 (Mr. F)
Sorry J Steve... hard to keep track of who does what. Need multiple tabs open.
Still, looks like a good large straight.
Definitely large straight. For the sake of voting, I propose we take the 1st instance of each number 1-6.
It was a complete team effort! Go team!
Sons: 4 3 1
4 3 1 3
4 3 1 3 2
So we have a straight, right?
4 3 1 3 2 6
Two more chances to roll a 5...
4 3 1 3 2 6 6
Ughh...one more chance. At least I have a small straight licked up.
* steals the Son's 5*
@MLASF
You are correct, sir.
5 stolen and apostrophe placed for Dusty's benefit/annoyance.
Wait a moment.
For voting strategy, I say we take the first die of each number one through five, not through six as I said earlier. Only the first one and the first two should be used if that's how we decide to vote.
^I meant locked up, not licked up.
Oh baby, baby, baby! Got the 5! I see the Readers' Large Straight and raise you one more number in the sequence for an Extra-Large Straight: 1 2 3 4 5 6!! Which of course triggers the unwritten but widely accepted rule that Extra Large Straights are worth 60 points.
FYI I acknowledge that I'm way more excited than the situation warrants.
I suppose the apostrophe placement could be considered correct, since it's only EK wrangling the dice.
Ahhhhhh. What happened?
crap, gotta get a poll up before the Readers solidify a strategy...
Actually I guess the Readers got an Extra Large Straight too. I'm not that special after all
Sweet, so we both get 60 points, right EK?
If I remember my unwritten rules correctly, only the first Extra Large Straight is worth 60 points so EK is out of luck.
Yeah, alas I believe you are correct Jason. The second one is worth 70 points.
Booyah!
We can just make up rules as we go along? Nice. I'm learning so much about this game!
FUCK THE GNATS
FUCK PHILI
LSFTW!
I've got an Extra Large Straight.
Post a Comment