Sons of Steve Garvey: Yaht R11, Initial Roll

40 comments:

MR.F said...: roll; 10/25/2010 8:14 AM
Nostradamus said...: Barrel roll.; 10/25/2010 8:14 AM
Nostradamus said...: 4-6...

I found the mystery 6. Are there more in there?; 10/25/2010 8:19 AM
Nostradamus said...: 4-6-2...

Not yet.; 10/25/2010 8:20 AM
Nostradamus said...: 4-6-2-2, and I'm spent.; 10/25/2010 8:21 AM
Eric Karros said...: roll; 10/25/2010 8:26 AM
Steve Sax said...: Roll, baby!; 10/25/2010 8:30 AM
MR.F said...: Roll again; 10/25/2010 8:33 AM
Eric Karros said...: Sons: 2 5; 10/25/2010 8:34 AM
Nostradamus said...: This comment has been removed by the author.; 10/25/2010 8:41 AM
Nostradamus said...: Can we pull a fourth 2? We've only got the sons' 9 to beat in the 4-of-a-kind category. Not ideal, but it sure beats zero.

(Comment revised for Dusty's sanity); 10/25/2010 8:50 AM
Steve Sax said...: who just pulled that comment deletion? lame...

ROLL; 10/25/2010 8:53 AM
Steve Sax said...: j-ROLL (sucks); 10/25/2010 8:53 AM
MR.F said...: Roll With a Vengeance.; 10/25/2010 8:59 AM
rbnlaw said...: Roll, bizalacka!; 10/25/2010 8:59 AM
spank said...: Did I miss the bus?; 10/25/2010 9:11 AM
Nostradamus said...: Sax,

That was my comment. It wouldn't count anyway, and it would've just pissed Dusty off because of an apostrophe mishap.; 10/25/2010 9:20 AM
rbnlaw said...: Now, what we got?; 10/25/2010 9:21 AM
rbnlaw said...: For the love. We suck.; 10/25/2010 9:23 AM
MR.F said...: Damn. Okay. Last time I roll 3 times. Sorry guys.; 10/25/2010 9:43 AM
MR.F said...: Based on the quality of my rolls, you know I have to be a Dodger fan, right?; 10/25/2010 9:52 AM
Steve Sax said...: are we done with the rolling yet?; 10/25/2010 11:13 AM
Nostradamus said...: Stop with the twos already.; 10/25/2010 11:16 AM
Jason said...: I got 4 6 6 2 2 1 5 1. Mr C's second roll was a 6, not a 2. Not that our situation is improved all that much.; 10/25/2010 11:38 AM
Nostradamus said...: Indeed it was. I'd gladly trade both for a three, though.; 10/25/2010 11:46 AM
Josh S. said...: 0 on four-of-a-kind it is. Vote for whatever dice you want.; 10/25/2010 11:55 AM
Eric Karros said...: 2 5 2 3 2 2

Good rolling Sax! Now it's the 2's possibly teasing us with Yahtzee hope. I hope I don't F it up with this roll...; 10/25/2010 11:59 AM
Fred's Brim said...: taking the collar is no good

we may have to pray to a devil to get some 6s to appear; 10/25/2010 1:06 PM
Fred's Brim said...: and of course there's a 6; 10/25/2010 1:07 PM
Eric Karros said...: ok, I'll do last roll...; 10/25/2010 1:16 PM
Eric Karros said...: 2 5 2 3 2 2 5

Five, dammit

But I counted wrong! Still one more chance...; 10/25/2010 1:17 PM
Eric Karros said...: Another 5! 2 5 2 3 2 2 5 5. I'll take fives, thank you. Whew, not bad at this point in the game...; 10/25/2010 1:18 PM
Steve Sax said...: wait, you don't need my rolls anymore, right EK?; 10/25/2010 2:03 PM
rbnlaw said...: The Yahtzee equivalent of the Golden Sombrero.; 10/25/2010 2:07 PM
Eric Karros said...: No, but thanks Sax...we snagged a decent 5's score.; 10/25/2010 2:19 PM
Steve K said...: EK: Not to burst your bubble, but you got a "3" at 11:59, which would give you 2 5 2 3 2 2 3 5...

Then again, I probably missed something.; 10/25/2010 2:46 PM
Steve K said...: And our poll is off. We already have twos, fives, and chance filled. There was talk of taking a 0 for four-of-a-kind...; 10/25/2010 2:48 PM
Nostradamus said...: So, we both borked this round, then.

Also, for the category voting, the category list needs to be updated. Not that it matters, because I don't think anyone wants to zero out sixes or small straight.; 10/25/2010 2:50 PM
Josh S. said...: Please add 4-of-a-kind to the poll.; 10/25/2010 2:50 PM
Josh S. said...: DAMMIT.; 10/25/2010 2:51 PM