Wednesday, January 20, 2010

Orel's Sexy Bribe of the Day

We got some complaints that yesterday's sexy bribes weren't Dodger-related.

(Number of actual complaints: zero.)

Well, that's easily fixed.
(Easy as ABCDD!)

And in the interest of equal opportunity:

Don't forget the Pirates come to down April 29 to May 2!

22 comments:

Neeebs (The Original) said...

I'm speechless.

MeanieBreanie said...

Score one for the ladies! Johnny Depp is indeed great eye candy. But Orel honey, your quickly dropping points. A 3-1 ratio is what I would hardly consider equal opportunity.

MeanieBreanie said...

Oops, I have to go back to school. I meant to say 4-1 ratio. Even worse my friend!

Kyle Baker said...

I think we really need Erin to weigh in at some point.

Kyle Baker said...

Have we seriously not heard from Lasorda, Alex Cora, Pedro Guerrero, and Eric Karros on this whole campaign thing? Weak.

But I don't hold it against EK. I know he's busy developing a diabolical puzzle for the new season that will make us laugh and cry and call our moms.

AC, whattup? Let's hear from a brother.

Pedro, Lasorda....tsk. *looks down nose*

rbnlaw said...

Delino is a goner. Being an SC honk sealed his fate with me.

Orel, you're the breast. . .best.
(someone had to say it)

Mr. LA Sports Czar said...

+2

Orel: 7
Sax: 1
Everyone else: -1

Neeebs (The Original) said...

Somehow I'm liking the "A" Nothing wrong with the "A" Change is good.

*I guess I'm not really speechless*

Mr. LA Sports Czar said...

I would seriously advise some creativity on the part of the other Sons. Orel's got a pretty wide lead with the updated rankings.

Orel: 7
Delino: 2
Sax: 1
Everyone else: -1

Nostradamus said...

To be fair, most of those examples probably fall closer to "dodger-constrained" or "dodger-barely-concealed".

I haven't seen an actual Dodger with attributes like that since Mike Fetters.

Feel free to post additional examples to clarify your position, though.

Neeebs (The Original) said...

Did Mr. C just say, "clarify your position?"

Nostradamus said...

@neeebs

Yes. Instructional diagrams should be included for any requiring special knowledge, exceptional balance, or athletic prowess.

Nostradamus said...

Extra credit for alphabetical order, too.

Orel said...

"God is in the details." —Ludwig Mies van der Rohe

Nostradamus said...

@Orel

"Less is more." —Ludwig Mies van der Rohe

(though I beg to differ)

Orel said...

Is he really the bastard who said that? Such a cliché...but it's true.

Nostradamus said...

@Orel

It was he.

I don't think he was referring to this particular situation, though.

Jimbo said...

@ Meaniebrainie

I'd say it's more of an 8-1 ratio.

Kyle Baker said...

I can't believe no one has made the campaign promises I want to hear, e.g. abortions for some, miniature American flags for others.

Kyle Baker said...

Are #s 1-4 in order of magnitude by design or happenstance?

And, re: #4, aren't there rules about hanging things off the railing?

Nostradamus said...

@dusty

Methinks it was by design, but it could just be gravity. Exhibit D is probably holding on to the railing just for fear of toppling over.

They're like the russian nesting doll of secondary sexual characteristics.

MeanieBreanie said...

@Dr. Geek - Point/s well taken

@Orel - Although the ratio's and execution were off, you still score for effort and intent.