We got some complaints that yesterday's sexy bribes weren't Dodger-related.
Well, that's easily fixed.
And in the interest of equal opportunity:
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Orel's Sexy Bribe of the Day
Well, that's easily fixed.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
22 comments:
I'm speechless.
Score one for the ladies! Johnny Depp is indeed great eye candy. But Orel honey, your quickly dropping points. A 3-1 ratio is what I would hardly consider equal opportunity.
Oops, I have to go back to school. I meant to say 4-1 ratio. Even worse my friend!
I think we really need Erin to weigh in at some point.
Have we seriously not heard from Lasorda, Alex Cora, Pedro Guerrero, and Eric Karros on this whole campaign thing? Weak.
But I don't hold it against EK. I know he's busy developing a diabolical puzzle for the new season that will make us laugh and cry and call our moms.
AC, whattup? Let's hear from a brother.
Pedro, Lasorda....tsk. *looks down nose*
Delino is a goner. Being an SC honk sealed his fate with me.
Orel, you're the breast. . .best.
(someone had to say it)
+2
Orel: 7
Sax: 1
Everyone else: -1
Somehow I'm liking the "A" Nothing wrong with the "A" Change is good.
*I guess I'm not really speechless*
I would seriously advise some creativity on the part of the other Sons. Orel's got a pretty wide lead with the updated rankings.
Orel: 7
Delino: 2
Sax: 1
Everyone else: -1
To be fair, most of those examples probably fall closer to "dodger-constrained" or "dodger-barely-concealed".
I haven't seen an actual Dodger with attributes like that since Mike Fetters.
Feel free to post additional examples to clarify your position, though.
Did Mr. C just say, "clarify your position?"
@neeebs
Yes. Instructional diagrams should be included for any requiring special knowledge, exceptional balance, or athletic prowess.
Extra credit for alphabetical order, too.
"God is in the details." —Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
@Orel
"Less is more." —Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
(though I beg to differ)
Is he really the bastard who said that? Such a cliché...but it's true.
@Orel
It was he.
I don't think he was referring to this particular situation, though.
@ Meaniebrainie
I'd say it's more of an 8-1 ratio.
I can't believe no one has made the campaign promises I want to hear, e.g. abortions for some, miniature American flags for others.
Are #s 1-4 in order of magnitude by design or happenstance?
And, re: #4, aren't there rules about hanging things off the railing?
@dusty
Methinks it was by design, but it could just be gravity. Exhibit D is probably holding on to the railing just for fear of toppling over.
They're like the russian nesting doll of secondary sexual characteristics.
@Dr. Geek - Point/s well taken
@Orel - Although the ratio's and execution were off, you still score for effort and intent.
Post a Comment