Random rantings and ravings about the Los Angeles Dodgers, written by a small consortium of rabid Dodger fans. With occasional comments on baseball, entertainment, pop culture, and life in general.
I don't read Simers all that much, but can someone explain what the hell the point of this article is?
Is the dialgoue with Charley Steiner and Rick Monday real? Imaginary? Irrelevant?
How is it tied in with the McCourts or Matt Kemp or Andre Ethier?
What is going on here?
4/3 vs. SF (W, 5-4): Sax
4/15 vs. WSH (L, 4-6): Dusty, Orel, Sax
5/6 vs. MIA (W, 6-3): AC, Sax
5/16 vs. CIN (L, 2-7): AC, Sax
6/12 vs. TEX (L, 2-3): Sax
7/5 vs. MIL (W, 8-5): Sax
7/21 vs. BOS (W, 9-6): Sax
7/24 vs. SF (L, 3-8): Sax
8/24 vs. TB (L, 8-9 (10)): Sax
8/29 vs. BAL (W, 6-3): Orel, Sax
9/9 vs. CHC (L, 4-10): Sax
10/5 NLDS G1 vs. SD (W, 7-5): Sax
10/6 NLDS G2 vs. SD (L, 2-10): Orel, Sax
10/25 WS G1 vs. NYY (W, 6-3 (10)): Sax
4 comments:
i could only get through half of that
What goes through the LA Times' mind when they pay him? They literally give him a salary to write for the paper, they send him to San Diego, he gets per diem and time with nearly every member of the team, and this is what he does with it? Some incoherent blather describing incoherent blather?
I could only get through...wait, I didn't even click on it. I can't bring myself even to begin.
Simers needs the American History X face to the curb treatment.
Post a Comment