My recent Felix the Cat fixation helped me detect a rule of thumb for certain male cartoon characters. They may have girlfriends and/or female relatives, but not wives. And they may have nephews and/or nieces, but not children:
niece: Splinter |
Why this rigidity? These characters were created under different studios (including Disney, Hanna-Barbera and Universal) at different times (from 1919 to 1969). I can understand why fans would find real-life stars more appealing as child-friendly but childless bachelors, but cartoon characters? Is this a case of anthropomorphization gone amok, or are these preferences more subtle expressions of the creators of these characters?
Winnie Woodpecker from Wonderful World of Animation; Felix cap from Strictly Fitteds
17 comments:
Whenever my grandpa would take me out for ice cream at the local Thrifty store, I'd become his nephew too.
Unfortunately for him, missing front teeth and broken English got him no attention from the hotties working the ice cream counter.
What about Captain Caaaaaaaaaaaaveman...and son?
heres another one that popped into my head with this new Cartoon Cousin phenomenon
http://images.nextnewnetworks.com/14814_large.gif
http://images.nextnewnetworks.com/14814_large.gif
plus these two kryptonian cousins
http://www.comicartcommunity.com/gallery/data/media/148/Superman__Kara_Zor-EL.jpg
Is this thing supposed to be vertical, or is it just me?
You forgot about Condorito and his girlfriend, Yayita and his nephew, Cone (Pronounced, ("Co nay")
So it even works in latin american comics.
www.condorito.com
I always assumed that it was so they their inclusion in a particluar storline was optional. No need have to explain where the kids are while our hero is...
...On vacation
...rescuing the damsel in distress
...saving the world
However, the same circumstance often appears in feature animation, which doesn't quite follow.
yeah, what Mr. Customer said. and if these kids (whom the creators are including for some variety) are going to be Donald's/Scooby's/Mighty Man's/etc actual children, there has to be an explanation of why the kids aren't always around their father, where's mom, stuff that kids back in the 60s and 70s would wonder.
Main cartoon characters give up their genitalia in exchange for fame and top billing. Their background siblings are given bit parts and become horrible stage parents.
I thought everyone knew that.
Also, in the 90's, Goofy suddenly had a son named Max Goof, which is just about as a Poochie a name as anyone could possibly come up with.
What about Fry-Prof. Farnsworth on Futurama? Now there's a cartoon uncle-nephew story that actually makes sense
How come Winnie and Daisy already have the same last names as their boyfriends?
Story on CBS Sports says Ron Artest is coming to the Lakers.
@Cynic
It's a commonwealth kind of thing. Either that or the face that most animals are incestuous anyway.
Thanks Midnightdrive. That explains a lot, maybe Too much....
You know Scooby's got offspring scattered about, including some he's not even aware of.
But in all seriousness I totally agree with Mr Customer's reasoning.
Post a Comment