Potentially against her will, Megan Fox has indeed been dropped from Transformers 3: Attack of the CGI Robot Battlescenes (as Delino posted last night in the GameThread):
Paramount Pictures said Wednesday that Fox's option was not picked up for part three in the blockbuster Michael Bay series. The studio, which released the first two movies about shape-shifting machines doing battle, declined to give further details or say who would replace the 24-year-old actress.
Fox's publicist, Dominique Appel, did not return a message left at her office seeking comment.LOS ANGELES (AP) — Megan Fox, who made her name as Shia LaBeouf's sultry love interest in the first two Transformers movies, has been dropped from the third.
And if this graph is scientific, I can only conclude we're in for a short third movie, right?
Sigh. I suppose there's always Jonah Hex.
While we're considering pie graphs, I want to shout out to Josh S. for his post at 4.28p in yesterday's GT, alerting us to this also hilarious graph:
9 comments:
That's a generous plot extrapolation.
I concur.
That graph must not be for Revenge of the Fallen since I don't see a value for "mind-numbing horseshit."
I would have liked to see 95% Megan Fox and 5% explosions.
Is that RAND study finished that was going to map the tangents explored in the average SoSG GT?
@Dusty
They've outsourced the task to Deep Thought. Only 9,999,999 Years and 10 months left on the progress bar.
But presumably Robots & Explosions are splitting their half of the pie, so Megan Fox wins by a landslide.
No Megan Fox in Transformers equals a lot fewer kids going through puberty next summer
@Chris
Megan Fox also equals explosions.
Hey-O.
Post a Comment