Sorry about that epigram. Keith Law's reference of a "gangrenous wound in left field [left to] fester" triggered some high-school English class memories (link insider only). But I digress:
I've ranted many times about the folly of signing a middle reliever to any deal beyond two years -- and even two years is fairly risky because you're looking at maybe a 25-30 percent chance the reliever holds his performance through both years of the contract (and roughly half those odds for him to do it for three years). I do like Guerrier for his repertoire and chance to get better against left-handed batters by using his changeup more, but he's 32 years old, appeared in 47 percent of the Twins' games over the last four years, and (per Fangraphs) has lost a mile an hour off his fastball in that time. This is not someone in whom you want to invest multiple years and eight figures.
Besides, is the bullpen even such a concern for the Dodgers?
If there's one thing they have, it's bullpen arms, and while more depth is always better, it's not something you want to pay for. Is Guerrier going to be $3.6 million better than Kenley Jansen this year -- or next year? Chris Withrow has an electric arm but has had command problems for most of his pro career; why not move him to the pen and bring him up rather than have him spend 2011 in Albuquerque, one of the worst pitchers' parks in organized baseball?
Free agency isn't a good way to build a bullpen, but doing it that way when the Dodgers' amateur scouting team continues to stuff the organization with power arms is just nonsensical.Apparently the three-year deal for the middle reliever is the new black. First Joaquin Benoit, then Scott Downs, and now Matt Guerrier. The Dodgers are happy to let the gangrenous wound in left field fester, but thank goodness the seventh inning is locked down.
I don't agree with Law in saying that the Dodgers don't have bullpen concerns, not after last year. But we sure do seem stocked with arms of some sort, and yet every couple of days it seems we're picking up another pitcher (or 75-year-old utility retread batter). Guerrier's signing doesn't seem like the right priority at this stage of the game.
Law goes on to bash the Yank-Mes for signing Russell Martin, so it's good times all around for Dodgers past and future. Just thinking about all of this evokes visions of tragic, unfulfilled potential.
10 comments:
3-year deals for middle relievers are the new 7-year deals for outfielders.
Fate? I'm writing my final paper tonight on Snows...
@Rob: Dude, how many other Dodger blogs are going to give you Hemingway allusions?
But if you need help on the paper, you should email us and ask for Orel's help. He nails literary meaning and symbolism.
It is very early right now.
or very late...
what are you up to, Saxy?
not busy working on the 6AM post, that's for sure!
sorry :)
@FB: ah shit, ya got me...
@Rob - Or, if you haven't submitted it yet and want us to post it for constructive critique from our readers, just email it over.
I'm pretty sure they'll at least catch any grammar errors.
@Rob: I second the EK proposal. I would be happy to at least publish your first couple paragraphs...
Post a Comment