Random rantings and ravings about the Los Angeles Dodgers, written by a small consortium of rabid Dodger fans. With occasional comments on baseball, entertainment, pop culture, and life in general.
If ever two Connect Four columns deserved a win, it was last round, where Quad's Column F and Neeebs' and Steve's Column D waged an epic battle. Both columns left it all out on the post, but only one could emerge triumphant: Column F.
On to Round 3!
4/3 vs. SF (W, 5-4): Sax
4/15 vs. WSH (L, 4-6): Dusty, Orel, Sax
5/6 vs. MIA (W, 6-3): AC, Sax
5/16 vs. CIN (L, 2-7): AC, Sax
6/12 vs. TEX (L, 2-3): Sax
7/5 vs. MIL (W, 8-5): Sax
7/21 vs. BOS (W, 9-6): Sax
7/24 vs. SF (L, 3-8): Sax
8/24 vs. TB (L, 8-9 (10)): Sax
8/29 vs. BAL (W, 6-3): Orel, Sax
9/9 vs. CHC (L, 4-10): Sax
10/5 NLDS G1 vs. SD (W, 7-5): Sax
10/6 NLDS G2 vs. SD (L, 2-10): Orel, Sax
10/25 WS G1 vs. NYY (W, 6-3 (10)): Sax
9 comments:
Column D
At the risk of giving away too much strategy, here's my thoughts. Column D prevents the writers from building up too much in the center of the board. It also allows us to start a diagonal attack in two directions. Plus, moving anywhere besides Column D means that our next move would have to be Column D (writers move would be Column D giving them three in a row there). Might as well move there and get some benefit out of it.
Just for fun...
http://tinyurl.com/33bj86
Quad brings up a good point. The writers can see our strategic discussions! But we can't see theirs.
Don't worry Fanerman, we can't see ours either
Nice find, Q7!
These commenters are playing to not lose, rather than playing to win.
Connect Four color commentary!
Defense wins championships
Hey EK, I forget, are we red or black?
Post a Comment