Random rantings and ravings about the Los Angeles Dodgers, written by a small consortium of rabid Dodger fans. With occasional comments on baseball, entertainment, pop culture, and life in general.
To be honest, it seemed to me that mcr had a pretty solid argument for going with Column E last round. And if not Column E, then at least Column D would have forced the Writers into a defense move, after which you could pick up on the Column E strategy anew. But the people have spoken, and Column F it is. Why Column F? I think I know - you all want to prolong the game because it's so much frickin' fun! So your wish has been granted, and on we go to the next round...
4/3 vs. SF (W, 5-4): Sax
4/15 vs. WSH (L, 4-6): Dusty, Orel, Sax
5/6 vs. MIA (W, 6-3): AC, Sax
5/16 vs. CIN (L, 2-7): AC, Sax
6/12 vs. TEX (L, 2-3): Sax
7/5 vs. MIL (W, 8-5): Sax
7/21 vs. BOS (W, 9-6): Sax
7/24 vs. SF (L, 3-8): Sax
8/24 vs. TB (L, 8-9 (10)): Sax
8/29 vs. BAL (W, 6-3): Orel, Sax
9/9 vs. CHC (L, 4-10): Sax
7 comments:
this is why i hate democracy. :-P ok, back to obsessing over fantasy football and waiting for pitchers and catchers to report to spring training... and wondering whether i can steal billingsley in the late rounds of my baseball draft again this year...
Its D then (assuming SOSG plays D) then B.
why not F?
Because we save F as a safety valve.
why am i an idiot?
Let's not resort to name calling now.
F is not a good move because it will allow the writers to block our winning diagonal.
G is not a good move because it will allow the writers to win with four horizontal pieces.
I'm no connect 4 guru.. but uh... yeah... wow! lets not ever take this past connect 4.
Post a Comment