Random rantings and ravings about the Los Angeles Dodgers, written by a small consortium of rabid Dodger fans. With occasional comments on baseball, entertainment, pop culture, and life in general.
Okay, so Round 5 was indeed a no-brainer for the Readers despite my attempts to convince otherwise (you guys are too damn sharp!). Column E not only provided the block, but it also forced the Writers into a defensive move in Column B. Are the Readers now moving to the offensive?
P.S. Can you imagine if we kept this at one round per week as originally planned?
4/3 vs. SF (W, 5-4): Sax
4/15 vs. WSH (L, 4-6): Dusty, Orel, Sax
5/6 vs. MIA (W, 6-3): AC, Sax
5/16 vs. CIN (L, 2-7): AC, Sax
6/12 vs. TEX (L, 2-3): Sax
7/5 vs. MIL (W, 8-5): Sax
7/21 vs. BOS (W, 9-6): Sax
7/24 vs. SF (L, 3-8): Sax
8/24 vs. TB (L, 8-9 (10)): Sax
8/29 vs. BAL (W, 6-3): Orel, Sax
9/9 vs. CHC (L, 4-10): Sax
10/5 NLDS G1 vs. SD (W, 7-5): Sax
10/6 NLDS G2 vs. SD (L, 2-10): Orel, Sax
10/25 WS G1 vs. NYY (W, 6-3 (10)): Sax
6 comments:
I don't know this game. Do diagonals count? If so, the next move is so obvious that I'd guess diagonals *don't* count?
Readers have become a pretty offensive bunch.
Berko: diagonals count...but so does gravity. Read this for the basic C4 rules.
Nice bling, Karina
I think at one round per week, the game would have bored us all to death. And then someone would make a mistake that ends the game.
Eric, if i'm not mistaken, you gave me this bling. I need to have an avatar for the offseason.
Post a Comment