Random rantings and ravings about the Los Angeles Dodgers, written by a small consortium of rabid Dodger fans. With occasional comments on baseball, entertainment, pop culture, and life in general.
...which explains why the Dodgers weren't in on Richie Sexson as a pinch hitter at less than $200,000 for the rest of the season.
Yankees have tentative deal with first baseman Sexson (ESPN.com)
3/28 vs. DET (W, 8-5 (10)): Sax
4/2 vs. ATL (W, 6-5): AC
5/17 vs. LAA (L, 2-6): Sax
5/31 vs. NYY (W, 18-2): Dusty, Sax
6/15 vs. SF (W, 5-4): AC
6/18 vs. SD (W, 4-3): AC
6/22 vs. WAS (W, 13-7): AC, Dusty
3 comments:
Oh, the Dodgers were in on it. He just wanted no part of the sinking ship.
Am i the only one who sees the title of this thread puzzle-worth material? (though, clearly, i suck solving them)
I'm thinking Photoshop contest.
Post a Comment