Random rantings and ravings about the Los Angeles Dodgers, written by a small consortium of rabid Dodger fans. With occasional comments on baseball, entertainment, pop culture, and life in general.
Really tight window here for the final four in the semi-final round. Here's the proposition for tonight's game (Saturday, July 30); slight change in that you have to answer TRUE or FALSE:
At least one of two possible outcomes will happen: Chad Billingsley will record a win tonight OR Billingsley will walk four or more batters.
Cast your votes here. As usual, any votes made after 7:00 PM PT are invalid. Good luck!
4/3 vs. SF (W, 5-4): Sax
4/15 vs. WSH (L, 4-6): Dusty, Orel, Sax
5/6 vs. MIA (W, 6-3): AC, Sax
5/16 vs. CIN (L, 2-7): AC, Sax
6/12 vs. TEX (L, 2-3): Sax
7/5 vs. MIL (W, 8-5): Sax
7/21 vs. BOS (W, 9-6): Sax
7/24 vs. SF (L, 3-8): Sax
8/24 vs. TB (L, 8-9 (10)): Sax
8/29 vs. BAL (W, 6-3): Orel, Sax
9/9 vs. CHC (L, 4-10): Sax
10/5 NLDS G1 vs. SD (W, 7-5): Sax
10/6 NLDS G2 vs. SD (L, 2-10): Orel, Sax
10/25 WS G1 vs. NYY (W, 6-3 (10)): Sax
13 comments:
true
That seems unfair to people who get saddled with false. True has an either-or scenario, whereas false must have both situations fail to come to fruition.
Well, it's all moot if Josh and Neeebs don't comment soon.
Automatic bids for both Spank and Mr. C in the finals.
Wait! That's weird - there's a clear, common understanding of the game play in tonight's proposition.
(whoooooooa)
(wobbles, rights himself)
Wait, there are automatic bids? I thought one had to to at least comment in the thread.
Otherwise, after Josh commented last night, I wouldn't have even thought I needed to comment in that thread at all. Which of course would have then changed the run of play.
What I mean is that because Josh and Neeebs failed to comment, Spank and Mr. C automatically win, and therefore advance to the finals.
(cries)
(dry humps Marla)
LULZ
Whoops!
I'm bummed I forgot, but if Spank wasn't in the finals of a streaking game, it would be clear there's something wrong with the universe.
Sax are you sure your not a lawyer for the McCourts? The rules tonight had so many crazy scenarios!
i actually had an idea for the last proposition to be this crazy multi-dimensional proposition, but after my quarter-final round fiasco, I decided to keep it more "up the middle".
With a slight twist.
Post a Comment