From today's LA Times' sports section:
Friday, October 10, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Random rantings and ravings about the Los Angeles Dodgers, written by a small consortium of rabid Dodger fans. With occasional comments on baseball, entertainment, pop culture, and life in general.
4/3 vs. SF (W, 5-4): Sax
4/15 vs. WSH (L, 4-6): Dusty, Orel, Sax
5/6 vs. MIA (W, 6-3): AC, Sax
5/16 vs. CIN (L, 2-7): AC, Sax
6/12 vs. TEX (L, 2-3): Sax
7/5 vs. MIL (W, 8-5): Sax
7/21 vs. BOS (W, 9-6): Sax
7/24 vs. SF (L, 3-8): Sax
8/24 vs. TB (L, 8-9 (10)): Sax
8/29 vs. BAL (W, 6-3): Orel, Sax
9/9 vs. CHC (L, 4-10): Sax
10/5 NLDS G1 vs. SD (W, 7-5): Sax
10/6 NLDS G2 vs. SD (L, 2-10): Orel, Sax
10/25 WS G1 vs. NYY (W, 6-3 (10)): Sax
12 comments:
You're...welcome?
Thank you Dodger fans, and not thank you Dodgers fans?
The cursive looks odd without the S on the end
Either way, they could really thank us by getting us a reliever and a healthy SS bat
But instead we will probably get three veteran outfielders
On the other hand, "Dodgers Fans" sounds weird to me. "Dodger Fans" is more natural.
Like when people say or type "Dodgers Stadium." Gives me the heebie-jebbies.
Dodger's Stadium. Cc:Dusty
Oh no you di-unt, Spanky!
So, logically speaking, they have been aiming for a 2015 World Series championship, not necessarily a 2014 one, so they're still on plan for that.
The LA Times? No one reads the paper anymore...Why not mail out thank you cards? ;-)
Or thank-you giants?
Cards are going to fold for giants. :(!!
InBev?
Queres un Steel Reserve,vato?
Post a Comment